Alfresco and Groovy, Baby!
To that end I decided to see if there was a way to implement Alfresco Web Scripts using Groovy, ideally in the hope of gaining access to the powerful Alfresco Java APIs with all of the productivity benefits of working in a scripting-like interpreted environment.
It turns out that the Spring Framework (a central part of Alfresco) moved in this direction some time ago, with support for what they refer to as dynamic-language-backed beans. Given that a Java backed Web Script is little more than a Spring bean plus a descriptor and some view templates, initially it seemed like Groovy backed Web Scripts might be possible in Alfresco already, merely by adding the Groovy runtime JAR to the Alfresco classpath and then configuring a Java-backed Web Script with a dynamic-language-backed Spring bean.
Unfortunately this approach ran into one small snag: Alfresco requires that Java Web Script beans have a “parent” of “webscript”, as follows:
<constructor-arg index="0" ref="ServiceRegistry" />
but Spring doesn’t allow dynamic-language-backed beans to have a “parent” clause.
It’s freedom baby, yeah!
There are several ways to work around this issue, but the simplest was to implement a “proxy” Web Script bean in Java that simply delegates to another Spring bean, which itself could be a dynamic-language-backed Spring bean implemented in any of the dynamic languages Spring supports.
This class ends up looking something like (imports and comments removed in the interest of brevity):
public class DelegatingWebScript
private final DynamicDeclarativeWebScript dynamicWebScript;
public DelegatingWebScript(final DynamicDeclarativeWebScript dynamicWebScript)
this.dynamicWebScript = dynamicWebScript;
protected Map executeImpl(WebScriptRequest request, Status status, Cache cache)
return(dynamicWebScript.execute(request, status, cache));
While DynamicDeclarativeWebScript looks something like:
public interface DynamicDeclarativeWebScript
Map execute(WebScriptRequest request, Status status, Cache cache);
This Java interface defines the API the Groovy code needs to implement in order for the DelegatingWebScript to be able to delegate to it correctly when the Web Script is invoked.
The net effect of all this is that a Web Script can now be implemented in Groovy (or any of the dynamic languages Spring supports for beans), by implementing the DynamicDeclarativeWebScript interface in a Groovy class, declaring a Spring bean with the script file containing that Groovy class and then configuring a new DelegatingWebScript instance with that dynamic bean. This may sound complicated, but as you can see in this example, is pretty straightforward:
<lang:property name="serviceRegistry" ref="ServiceRegistry" />
<constructor-arg index="0" ref="groovy.myWebScript" />
While a little more work than I’d expected, this approach meets all of my goals of being able to write Groovy backed Web Scripts, and in the interests of sharing I’ve put the code up on the Alfresco forge Google Code.
I demand the sum… …OF 1 MILLION DOLLARS!
But wait – there’s more! Not content with simply providing a framework for developing custom Web Scripts in Groovy, I decided to test out this framework by implementing a “Groovy Shell” Web Script. The idea here is that rather than having to develop and register a new Groovy Web Script each and every time I want to tinker with some Groovy code, instead the Web Script would receive the Groovy code as a parameter and execute whatever is passed to it.
Before we go any further, I should mention one very important thing: this opens up a massive script-injection-attack hole in Alfresco, and as a result this Web Script should NOT be used in any environment where data loss (or worse!) is unacceptable!! It is trivial to upload a script that does extremely nasty things to the machine hosting Alfresco (including, but by no means limited to, formatting all drives attached to the system) so please be extremely cautious about where this Web Script gets deployed!
The code also transforms the output of the script into JSON format, since there are existing Java libraries for transforming arbitrary object graphs (as would be returned by an arbitrary Groovy script) into JSON format.
Here’s a screenshot showing the end result:
The more observant reader will have noticed the notes in the top right corner, particularly the note referring to a “serviceRegistry” object. Before evaluating the script, the Web Script injects the all important Alfresco ServiceRegistry object into the execution context of the script, in a Groovy variable called “serviceRegistry”. The reason for doing so is obvious – this allows the script to interrogate and manipulate the Alfresco repository:
Sharks with lasers strapped to their heads!
Now if you look carefully at this script, you’ll notice that it (mostly) looks like Java, and this is where the value of this Groovy Shell Web Script starts to become apparent: because most valid Java code is also valid Groovy code, you can use this Web Script to prototype Java code that interacts with the Alfresco repository, without going through the usual Java rigmarole of compiling, packaging, deploying and restarting!
I recently conducted an in-depth custom code review for an Alfresco customer who had used Java extensively, and this Web Script was a godsend – not only did I eliminate the drudgery of compiling, packaging and deploying the customer’s custom code (not to mention restarting Alfresco each time), I also completely avoided the time consuming (and, let’s be honest, painful) task of trying to reverse engineer their build toolchain so that I could build the code in my environment. This alone was worth the price of admission, but coupled with the rapid turnaround on changes (the mythical “edit / test / edit / test” cycle), I was able to diagnose their issues in a much shorter time than would otherwise have been possible.
As always I’m keen to hear of your experiences with this project should you choose to use it, and am keen to have others join me in maintaining and enhancing the code (which is surprisingly little, once all’s said and done).
Technically Groovy does not have an interpreter; rather it compiles source scripts into JVM bytecode on demand. The net effect for the developer however is the same – the developer doesn’t have to build, package or deploy their code prior to execution – a serious productivity boost.